Apple iPhone vs Nokia Tube vs Android G1

Well, it was for centuries to come. Prophesised Byzantine monks of the battle among the three phones, each seeking supremacy touchscreen ... and now we bring you this battle. We hope that the edge of your seat is comfortable ...

Media
Each unit is worth its salt these days (the amount of salt is worth exactly?) Can do all sorts of tricks and features ... if it can not read music, show movies and photos from your window, what is the point huh?

The iPhone is a device for the media, since it affects an iPod (or iPod is an iPhone Lite). The movies are a dream to watch, the pictures are easy to browse through using the touch screen and uses music from Apple mainframe Cover Flow.

G1 does not even come with a video player in the box - photo display is average at best, music and reading is a bit bog-standard compared to its peers. Must do better for Android ... but the development community will probably be the case on-chip fast.
The Tube is a great feature media also with the media bar accessible at any time. Comes with the functionality of Music will open the device to a wealth of music, video appears crisp and pleasant, and photos, while slow to load, are OK to fly through.

The verdict Unfortunately for others, the iPhone lords it over all types of media, and we have not even covered the YouTube capacity of the headset.

Home Screen
The place where she always begins the home screen needs to look good, or you simply get lost in a sea of possibilities.

The Nokia 5800 XpressMusic (we'll call the subway for simplicity) has an innovative four-photo on the front screen option - each person details are updated with the status Facebook, Flickr photos or texts and calls. The Menu button allows quick access to normal grid Nokia fans are familiar with.

The iPhone home screen just makes sense. No innovation, simple icons all in front of you. No room for more? Well, simply drag along the screen and see the next round.

G1 of the Android home screen is too innovative, but incorporates the ideas of intelligent iPhone. The icons can be moved; open applications can be pulled down the top of the screen and a slide to the right entitles you to search Google. It also makes sense, but in a more complex.

The verdict G1 The interface is simple and friendly with some good bells and whistles, and the swishing and swooshing means that the edges of the iPhone simplicity and tube innovation.

Operating Systems
It might look fancy, but how does it actually work in real life? A bad OS will make you cry whenever you open a new menu screen ... a layer interface could make you forget you're even using a mobile phone.

G1 of the interface is nothing more breathtaking, even if it is more about the potential of Android rather than the way it works now.

It is black, windows changes quickly and allows you to move and in applications with ease through the menu.

The tube interface is a little cluttered throughout, and the menu system of the old simplistic beginning to be a little dated.

S60 is a system of aging, and even if it has been re-designed for touch, it still creaks in multiple applications.

Media Bar gives access to decent d'importantes applications on the phone, but it is still slow in case of change.

The iPhone interface is the same as its home screen: it is smooth, pretty and no jobs, with the addition of easy implementation.

The verdict Android would probably win based on performance in G1 alone ... you add in the potential on other devices and it is impressive source of inspiration.

Internet
It does not ask more than one phone to Nokia - a multimedia terminal. With this in mind that if you can not browse the Web is full prodigy-bang fashion, then you'll feel severely deprived.

The tube full HTML browser is smooth and easy to use ... But even if Flash, it is still very slow to load pages (May just 3G connection in place and that it is still a pre-production model), but seems a bit slow overall. .. something common to the browser Nokia over the years.

The iPhone Internet experience, even without flash, is still the best mobile Internet to date, and the multi-touch aspect pinch zoom is a pleasure to use.

G1 of the Internet is also slower than the subway, and even less intuitive move and navigate through. A little more development or maybe some new applications this help without end, but the G1 is not only the device you want to buy for Internet only.

The verdict The iPhone does not just win this category - it owns, leases to competition, and then he won again.

Camera
Like it or hate it, each phone has a camera these days. It should be fairly easy to use so you can whip it each time, thanks to the children of today, YouTube is to download a bonus too, when you want to show everyone that hilarious when you ate a snail.

The tube 3.2MP Carl Zeiss-ED is a little snapper ... the phone takes great pictures and is a cinch to use as well.

Video recording with a button to transfer photos and vids is a great feature as well, so Nokia should be happy with what they have placed on what is essentially a mid-range phone.
The iPhone camera is well documented, almost adequate, and quite old. The less said about it the better.

The G1 camera is a 3.2 (ISH) MP camera is also an option beautiful, but not the video recording is a crime in this day and age.

The verdict Nokia plays safe with it, by checking all boxes with a decent snapper. Well done.

Maps
"Where am I?" seems to be a question everyone is asking less and less with GPS on the devices. But how well do these actually help you to stop wandering aimlessly B when you have just left A?

GPS on all three devices have been impossible with hands on testing that we had ... the fact that the iPhone has really had a decent run ... and has been patchy at best to be honest.

G1 and the iPhone both pack Google Maps, and Nokia ... Well, it goes with Nokia Maps, of course.

The tube mapping function is decent, and as intuitive as Google ... touch the devices are made to scroll through maps, and if the GPS is decent on the G1 and the subway, then it is all much of a muchness, although the G1 and the iPhone have options so streetview keep things interesting.

The verdict was a big old tie ... check all right without exactly impressive, even if just dishing the benefit of the doubt this is (we are in a generous mood).

SMS and e-mail
Tactile rock. But text entry they often suck. So that our line-up is turn the problem of ditching the physical keyboard?

The tube variety of input options, including handwriting mode, is it will appeal to many people: the two modes are QWERTY rather pleasant, and the full screen is nice and precise. The keyboard input method is also wide and comfortable, whether beginners to the touchscreen of the world will not be at home with the haptic.

G1 has a QWERTY keyboard, physical, so kind of cheating on it. But it is a good keyboard, and had to sacrifice a thinness to incorporate the sliding section.

The iPhone's QWERTY Wickedly work well in portrait mode, helped by the big screen. But haptic, despite forecasting supernaturally how it works for word what you want, is not enough for most.

The verdict The G1 has a physical keyboard on a contact. It no longer feel ...

Gaming
Although the DS and PSP are holding their own as play units, portable phones are enormous progress in this area. So what options do you have, and the main thing: they refuse Look?

G1, we used seems to have very few games, and the main Pacman seems to be ... we agree that this is a big game, but it does not really justice or show the device in any way.

The iPhone of the motion-based games, combined with some brilliant rendering and graphics, and a huge selection of titles to choose from, make a beautiful game on the device itself.

Anyone who has played Kroll will see what the phone can do, and while the DS and PSP are much better for a quick 15 minutes session Thursday here and there, it's great.

The tube games have been, frankly, poor in comparison. Fragmentary and a more exuberant graphics-accelerometer were a bit unnecessary ... if you think that would improve over time as new titles were released.

The verdict The iPhone is a mobile game device, so it takes. But only because the other two have not really had the chance to see what could be developed for them ... but the aircraft can not give users a lot of hope.


Conclusion
Well, have we like best? The iPhone is complete in most areas, the Nokia Tube a few buttons and features decent, particularly in the media and the camera, but the G1 Android interface is super-grand-smashing.

It is surprising, but it is a link between G1 and the iPhone at three victories each, with the G1 is not even close to being full potential yet.

The Nokia Tube is good in most areas but does not cut quite the mustard, especially when it comes to the S60 interface.

If done well for the iPhone and the G1 ... If you get any of these in your breeding, you should feel quite enough with oneself.